Per-Post Contracts vs. Period Contracts: Which Should You Choose?
This article was automatically translated from the Japanese original. Read the original in Japanese
Per-post contracts and period contracts each suit different goals: a per-post contract is better for a one-off push to generate buzz, while a period contract is better for building an ongoing relationship with the brand. Rather than deciding on the contract format first, you should work backward from the objective of your initiative to choose the right one.
Why You Shouldn't Decide the Contract Format First
If you settle on a contract format before anything else, you tend to retrofit your objective to match that format. If your actual goal is a one-off spike in buzz but you end up signing a period contract, you'll incur extra coordination costs just to sustain a relationship that doesn't need to continue. Conversely, if your goal is building an ongoing relationship but you use a per-post contract, you'll have to renegotiate a new contract each time, making it difficult for the relationship to accumulate momentum. The right order is to fix your objective first, then choose the contract format that matches it.
When Is a Per-Post Contract the Right Fit?
A per-post contract suits situations where you're aiming to generate buzz around a specific product or campaign through a single post. Because the scope of the contract is clearly defined, it's easier to agree on detailed conditions and deliverables for each post, and the initiative can be completed as a standalone effort. As noted in What Is an Ambassador? Differences from One-Off Sponsored Collaborations, and Which Fits Better, a one-off sponsored collaboration is a contract that focuses on a single specific post, which aligns with the thinking behind per-post contracts.
When Is a Period Contract the Right Fit?
A period contract suits situations where you want to build an ongoing relationship with the brand and accumulate a consistent worldview or message across multiple posts. The continuity and trust that a single post can't fully convey can instead be built up through sustained communication over a defined period. As noted in When Should You Switch from a One-Off Sponsored Collaboration to an Ambassador Contract?, in practice it's common to see a relationship built up through one-off, per-post contracts eventually lead to a consideration of switching to a period contract.
Scope of This Article
This article covers the correspondence between contract format and the objective of your initiative. It does not cover the specific clauses that should be included in a contract, nor the design of compensation.
Conclusion
Neither per-post contracts nor period contracts is inherently superior; the right choice depends on the objective of your initiative. Fixing your objective first and then choosing the contract format accordingly is what reduces coordination costs down the line.